ISO 27017:2015 vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)
What is the difference between ISO 27017:2015 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
ISO 27017:2015 is a information security framework applying in International, with 42 controls across 17 domains. CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) is a risk management framework applying in the United States (CFTC), with 39 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
ISO 27017:201542 controls
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)39 controls
Questions people ask about ISO 27017:2015 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)
What is the difference between ISO 27017:2015 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
ISO 27017:2015 has 42 controls while CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 39 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ISO 27017:2015 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ISO 27017:2015 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ISO 27017:2015 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ISO 27017:2015 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ISO 27017:2015 or CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 19011:20185 shared controlsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 270183 shared controlsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO/IEC 38500:20243 shared controlsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 535 shared controlsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FedRAMP Moderate30 shared controlsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FedRAMP High30 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ISO 27017:2015 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.