JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) vs SOC 2
What is the difference between JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) and SOC 2?
JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) is a quality management framework applying in Japan, with 46 controls across 3 domains. SOC 2 is a compliance framework applying in the United States, with 61 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan)46 controls
SOC 261 controls
Questions people ask about JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) and SOC 2
What is the difference between JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) and SOC 2?
JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) has 46 controls while SOC 2 has 61 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) and SOC 2?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) and SOC 2 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) and SOC 2 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) and SOC 2 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) or SOC 2?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between JFS-B Standard Ver. 3.1 Food Safety Management (Japan) and SOC 2 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.