NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs OWASP MASVS
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP MASVS?
NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. OWASP MASVS is a other framework applying in International, with 8 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 controls
OWASP MASVS8 controls
Questions people ask about NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP MASVS
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP MASVS?
NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security has 8 controls while OWASP MASVS has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP MASVS?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP MASVS so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP MASVS controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP MASVS at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security or OWASP MASVS?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs API 11648 shared controlsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 shared controlsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs OWASP ASVS6 shared controlsOWASP MASVS vs ISO 270177 shared controlsOWASP MASVS vs ISO 270437 shared controlsOWASP MASVS vs ISO 270187 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP MASVS on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.