Open Banking Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
What is the difference between Open Banking Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?
Open Banking Security is a financial services framework applying in the United Kingdom, with 8 controls across 9 domains. NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements is a information security framework applying in the United States (NIST), with 35 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
Open Banking Security8 controls
NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements35 controls
Questions people ask about Open Banking Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
What is the difference between Open Banking Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?
Open Banking Security has 8 controls while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Open Banking Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Open Banking Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Open Banking Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Open Banking Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Open Banking Security or NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Open Banking Security vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook5 shared controlsOpen Banking Security vs UK Open Banking Standard5 shared controlsOpen Banking Security vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems5 shared controlsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 shared controlsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea ISMS-P20 shared controlsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Open Banking Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.