Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) vs ISO 9001:2015
What is the difference between Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) and ISO 9001:2015?
Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) is a compliance framework applying in the United States, with 89 controls across 5 domains. ISO 9001:2015 is a quality management framework applying in International, with 56 controls across 7 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised)89 controls
ISO 9001:201556 controls
Questions people ask about Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) and ISO 9001:2015
What is the difference between Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) and ISO 9001:2015?
Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) has 89 controls while ISO 9001:2015 has 56 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) and ISO 9001:2015?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) and ISO 9001:2015 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) and ISO 9001:2015 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) and ISO 9001:2015 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) or ISO 9001:2015?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) vs FERPA2 shared controlsSection 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) vs Virginia CDPA2 shared controlsSection 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) vs Vietnam PDPD2 shared controlsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 13485:201614 shared controlsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 19011:201813 shared controlsISO 9001:2015 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System12 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Section 508 - ICT Accessibility (Revised) and ISO 9001:2015 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.