US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements vs PSD2 SCA
What is the difference between US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements and PSD2 SCA?
US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements is a information security framework applying in the United States (EPA), with 3 controls across 3 domains. PSD2 SCA is a other framework applying in the European Union, with 6 controls across 6 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements3 controls
PSD2 SCA6 controls
Questions people ask about US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements and PSD2 SCA
What is the difference between US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements and PSD2 SCA?
US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements has 3 controls while PSD2 SCA has 6 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements and PSD2 SCA?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements and PSD2 SCA so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements and PSD2 SCA controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements and PSD2 SCA at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements or PSD2 SCA?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20242 shared controlsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements vs OSFI B-132 shared controlsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements vs Open Banking Security2 shared controlsPSD2 SCA vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers4 shared controlsPSD2 SCA vs Vietnam PDPD4 shared controlsPSD2 SCA vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements4 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements and PSD2 SCA on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.