Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)
What is the difference between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) is a other framework applying in International (VP Initiative). IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) is a risk management framework applying in International (IAIS), with 47 controls across 22 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)0 controls
IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)47 controls
Questions people ask about Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)
What is the difference between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) while IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) has 47 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) or IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs IEC 624431 shared controlVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs Barbados Data Protection Act 20191 shared controlVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA)1 shared controlIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) vs MTCS (Singapore)5 shared controlsIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) vs South Korea ISMS-P5 shared controlsIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security4 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.