Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs SOC 2

Compare Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and SOC 2 across controls, requirements, and compliance scope. Use our compliance platform to see the full control-to-control mapping between these two frameworks.

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)31 controls

SOC 254 controls

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and SOC 2?

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) has 31 controls while SOC 2 has 54 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.

Do I need both Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and SOC 2?

Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and SOC 2 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.

How do Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and SOC 2 controls map to each other?

Our platform maps controls between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and SOC 2 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.

Which framework should I implement first, Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) or SOC 2?

The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.

Learn More About Each Framework