Skip to content
Financial ServicesCISO

AASB 136 Impairment of Assets for CISOs

What does AASB 136 Impairment of Assets require of a CISO?

The Australian adoption of IAS 36: when an entity must test an asset or cash-generating unit for impairment, how recoverable amount is measured as the higher of fair value less disposal costs and value in use (projection basis, excluded cash flows, pre-tax discount rate), how goodwill and corporate assets are allocated and tested, how impairment losses are recognised, allocated within a unit and reversed, and the disclosures about losses, units and the key assumptions and sensitivities behind goodwill tests, with the not-for-profit modifications. Under AASB 136 Impairment of Assets, which defines 27 controls, a CISO's work is deciding which controls you own outright, which you share and which belong to another team, then holding the evidence for the first group.

Which AASB 136 Impairment of Assets controls land on the CISO

CISOs own the organisation's information security strategy, budget, and risk posture. They translate compliance requirements into security programmes, report to the board, and balance security investment against business objectives.

AASB 136 Impairment of Assets defines 27 controls across 7 domains that directly affect the CISO role. Understanding which controls fall within your ownership, which are shared, and which are owned by other teams is the foundation of effective compliance management.

What a CISO is accountable for under AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

1

Defining and executing the information security strategy aligned to business goals

2

Presenting cyber risk posture and compliance status to the board and executive team

3

Allocating security budget across people, process, and technology investments

4

Managing the security organisation and building a security-aware culture

5

Overseeing incident response capability and crisis management readiness

Where CISOs lose time on AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

These are the most common obstacles CISOs face when managing AASB 136 Impairment of Assets compliance, and how to address them:

Challenge 1

Justifying security investment to the board with clear business metrics

Challenge 2

Managing compliance across multiple frameworks without duplicating effort

Challenge 3

Hiring and retaining qualified security professionals in a competitive market

Challenge 4

Keeping pace with evolving threats while maintaining compliance baselines

Challenge 5

Balancing security controls with business agility and user experience

A working order for a CISO starting on AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

1. Readiness Assessment

Take a 5-minute readiness assessment to identify your organisation's current gap profile against AASB 136 Impairment of Assets. Get a prioritised action plan tailored to your specific situation.

2. Cross-Framework Mapping

Use our platform to map AASB 136 Impairment of Assets controls against other frameworks you already comply with. Identify overlapping controls to reduce duplicate effort.

3. Build Your Toolkit

Equip yourself with AASB 136 Impairment of Assets toolkits, self-assessments, and implementation guides from our store. Resources designed specifically for CISOs managing compliance programmes.

4. Continuous Monitoring

Establish ongoing compliance monitoring using our platform's gap analysis tools. Track your maturity over time and demonstrate progress to stakeholders.

AASB 136 Impairment of Assets in your sector

Who else owns part of AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

Questions CISOs ask about AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

What does a CISO need to know about AASB 136 Impairment of Assets?
As a CISO, your key responsibilities under AASB 136 Impairment of Assets include defining and executing the information security strategy aligned to business goals and presenting cyber risk posture and compliance status to the board and executive team. The framework contains 27 controls that fall within your area of responsibility. Understanding which controls you own versus which are shared with other teams is critical for effective implementation.
How does AASB 136 Impairment of Assets affect the CISO role?
AASB 136 Impairment of Assets directly impacts CISOs through defining and executing the information security strategy aligned to business goals, presenting cyber risk posture and compliance status to the board and executive team, allocating security budget across people, process, and technology investments. The framework provides structure that helps CISOs demonstrate due diligence and report compliance status to stakeholders.
What are the biggest AASB 136 Impairment of Assets challenges for CISOs?
Common challenges include justifying security investment to the board with clear business metrics; managing compliance across multiple frameworks without duplicating effort; hiring and retaining qualified security professionals in a competitive market. Using cross-framework mapping tools and automated evidence collection can significantly reduce these pain points.
How should a CISO prepare for a AASB 136 Impairment of Assets audit?
Start by conducting a readiness assessment to identify gaps. Then focus on allocating security budget across people, process, and technology investments and managing the security organisation and building a security-aware culture. Maintain a current evidence repository and ensure all control owners have documented their processes. Our readiness reports provide a prioritised action plan specific to your gap profile.
What tools help CISOs manage AASB 136 Impairment of Assets compliance?
Effective AASB 136 Impairment of Assets compliance management requires tools for gap analysis, control mapping, evidence collection, and reporting. Our compliance platform provides AI-powered gap analysis across 1,248 frameworks with 315K+ verified control-to-control mappings, helping CISOs identify overlapping requirements and reduce duplicate compliance effort.

CISO: How ready is your organisation for AASB 136 Impairment of Assets?

Answer 25 questions and get a professional readiness report with gap analysis, maturity scores, and prioritised action items. Results in 5 minutes.

Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.Last updated .