Skip to content
Financial ServicesRisk Manager

AASB 136 Impairment of Assets for Risk Managers

What does AASB 136 Impairment of Assets require of a Risk Manager?

The Australian adoption of IAS 36: when an entity must test an asset or cash-generating unit for impairment, how recoverable amount is measured as the higher of fair value less disposal costs and value in use (projection basis, excluded cash flows, pre-tax discount rate), how goodwill and corporate assets are allocated and tested, how impairment losses are recognised, allocated within a unit and reversed, and the disclosures about losses, units and the key assumptions and sensitivities behind goodwill tests, with the not-for-profit modifications. Under AASB 136 Impairment of Assets, which defines 27 controls, a Risk Manager's work is deciding which controls you own outright, which you share and which belong to another team, then holding the evidence for the first group.

Which AASB 136 Impairment of Assets controls land on the Risk Manager

Risk Managers identify, assess, and prioritise organisational risks. They build risk registers, conduct risk assessments, define risk appetite, and ensure that compliance frameworks address the most material threats to the organisation.

AASB 136 Impairment of Assets defines 27 controls across 7 domains that directly affect the Risk Manager role. Understanding which controls fall within your ownership, which are shared, and which are owned by other teams is the foundation of effective compliance management.

What a Risk Manager is accountable for under AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

1

Conducting enterprise risk assessments and maintaining the risk register

2

Defining risk appetite and tolerance levels with executive leadership

3

Mapping compliance controls to identified risks for coverage analysis

4

Monitoring key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalating emerging threats

5

Integrating compliance, operational, and strategic risk management

Where Risk Managers lose time on AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

These are the most common obstacles Risk Managers face when managing AASB 136 Impairment of Assets compliance, and how to address them:

Challenge 1

Quantifying cyber risk in financial terms that resonate with executives

Challenge 2

Identifying gaps between compliance control coverage and actual risk exposure

Challenge 3

Integrating risk data from siloed tools and departments

Challenge 4

Keeping risk assessments current as the threat landscape evolves

Challenge 5

Prioritising remediation when resources are limited

A working order for a Risk Manager starting on AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

1. Readiness Assessment

Take a 5-minute readiness assessment to identify your organisation's current gap profile against AASB 136 Impairment of Assets. Get a prioritised action plan tailored to your specific situation.

2. Cross-Framework Mapping

Use our platform to map AASB 136 Impairment of Assets controls against other frameworks you already comply with. Identify overlapping controls to reduce duplicate effort.

3. Build Your Toolkit

Equip yourself with AASB 136 Impairment of Assets toolkits, self-assessments, and implementation guides from our store. Resources designed specifically for Risk Managers managing compliance programmes.

4. Continuous Monitoring

Establish ongoing compliance monitoring using our platform's gap analysis tools. Track your maturity over time and demonstrate progress to stakeholders.

AASB 136 Impairment of Assets in your sector

Who else owns part of AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

Questions Risk Managers ask about AASB 136 Impairment of Assets

What does a Risk Manager need to know about AASB 136 Impairment of Assets?
As a Risk Manager, your key responsibilities under AASB 136 Impairment of Assets include conducting enterprise risk assessments and maintaining the risk register and defining risk appetite and tolerance levels with executive leadership. The framework contains 27 controls that fall within your area of responsibility. Understanding which controls you own versus which are shared with other teams is critical for effective implementation.
How does AASB 136 Impairment of Assets affect the Risk Manager role?
AASB 136 Impairment of Assets directly impacts Risk Managers through conducting enterprise risk assessments and maintaining the risk register, defining risk appetite and tolerance levels with executive leadership, mapping compliance controls to identified risks for coverage analysis. The framework provides structure that helps Risk Managers demonstrate due diligence and report compliance status to stakeholders.
What are the biggest AASB 136 Impairment of Assets challenges for Risk Managers?
Common challenges include quantifying cyber risk in financial terms that resonate with executives; identifying gaps between compliance control coverage and actual risk exposure; integrating risk data from siloed tools and departments. Using cross-framework mapping tools and automated evidence collection can significantly reduce these pain points.
How should a Risk Manager prepare for a AASB 136 Impairment of Assets audit?
Start by conducting a readiness assessment to identify gaps. Then focus on mapping compliance controls to identified risks for coverage analysis and monitoring key risk indicators (kris) and escalating emerging threats. Maintain a current evidence repository and ensure all control owners have documented their processes. Our readiness reports provide a prioritised action plan specific to your gap profile.
What tools help Risk Managers manage AASB 136 Impairment of Assets compliance?
Effective AASB 136 Impairment of Assets compliance management requires tools for gap analysis, control mapping, evidence collection, and reporting. Our compliance platform provides AI-powered gap analysis across 1,248 frameworks with 315K+ verified control-to-control mappings, helping Risk Managers identify overlapping requirements and reduce duplicate compliance effort.

Risk Manager: How ready is your organisation for AASB 136 Impairment of Assets?

Answer 25 questions and get a professional readiness report with gap analysis, maturity scores, and prioritised action items. Results in 5 minutes.

Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.Last updated .