AI Safety
What is AI Safety?
Research and practices aimed at ensuring AI systems operate safely, reliably, and without causing unintended harm to individuals or society.
Terms that appear alongside ai safety
Each of these is named in at least one of the same controls as ai safety. The number is how many controls name both.
- governance 11 shared controls
- nist 9 shared controls
- ai governance 8 shared controls
- cybersecurity 8 shared controls
- transparency 7 shared controls
- eu ai act 7 shared controls
- governance framework 6 shared controls
- compliance 5 shared controls
Frameworks that govern ai safety
What the standards actually require on ai safety
Requirements naming ai safety across 6 standards, quoted from the control text.
Safety (Anzen 安全) is the second of 10 Principles per Japan AI Guidelines for Business + significantly extended by establishment of the Japan AI Safety Institute (AISI 日本AIセーフティ・インスティテュート) on 14 February 2024.
JP-AIG-Safety-Validation-Testing-Robustness-AISI-AI-Safety-Institute-Pre-Deployment-Evaluation-Red-Teaming · Japan AI Guidelines Safety + Validation + Testing + Robustness + AISI AI Safety Institute (14 Feb 2024) + Pre-Deployment Evaluation + Red Teaming + Capability Evaluations + AI Incident Database + Safe Deployment + AI Safety Reports →Clauses 8 + 8.1 + 8.2 establish ethical risk management and Clause 10 establishes validation of ethical outcomes. Per public IEEE 7000-2021 abstract + Wikipedia + academic literature (full IEEE text NOT reproduced): ethical risk identification covering: harm t...
IEEE7000-EthicalRisk-Identification-Analysis-Treatment-ValidationOutcomes · IEEE 7000 Clauses 8 + 8.1 + 8.2 - Ethical Risk Identification + Analysis + Treatment + Validation of Ethical Outcomes + AI Safety + Robustness + Adversarial Protection →FISMA coordination with CIRCIA + Zero Trust + Executive Orders + OMB Memoranda. CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022): Final Rule effective 2026;
FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028 · CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda →Article 6 designates the high-risk machinery categories listed in Annex I that are subject to mandatory third-party conformity assessment (because of the level of risk).
MR-Art.6_7 · High-risk machinery categories and safety components (Articles 6-7 + Annex I) →FIRST standards pipeline + 2024-2025 roadmap. CURRENT STANDARDS: CSIRT Services Framework v2.1 (2019) + CVSS v4.0 (2023) + TLP v2.0 (2022) + IEP v2.0 + MPCVD Guidelines + PSIRT Services Framework v1.1 (2020).
FIRST-Status-Pipeline · FIRST Standards Pipeline - 2024-2025 Roadmap and Coordination with NIS2, CIRCIA, EU CRA →ISMAP Assessment positions ISMAP within the comprehensive Japanese and international cloud security regulatory landscape. (1) External Assessment by ISMAP-Approved Auditor: CSP must undergo annual third-party assessment by ISMAP-approved audit organisation inc...
ISMAP-Assessment-ExternalAuditor-AnnualReview-CustomerTransparency-Coord-FedRAMP-IRAP-GCloud-PIPA-ISO27017 · ISMAP Assessment - External ISMAP-Approved Auditor + Annual Review + Customer Information and Transparency + Coordination FedRAMP/UK G-Cloud/Australia IRAP/Singapore MTCS + ISO 27017 + PIPA + Japan Digital Agency →Questions people ask about ai safety
What is AI Safety?
Why is AI Safety important for compliance?
Which compliance frameworks address AI Safety?
Where can I learn more about AI Safety?
See how AI Safety applies across compliance frameworks
Our platform maps 686 frameworks with 311K cross-framework control mappings. Explore how this concept is addressed across standards.