NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 106 controls across 12 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 controls
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0106 controls
Questions people ask about NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security has 8 controls while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security or NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs API 11648 shared controlsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs OWASP MASVS6 shared controlsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.