Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs MiFID II / MiFIR
What is the difference between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and MiFID II / MiFIR?
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) is a other framework applying in International (VP Initiative), with 35 controls across 4 domains. MiFID II / MiFIR is a other framework applying in the European Union, with 8 controls across 8 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)35 controls
MiFID II / MiFIR8 controls
Questions people ask about Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and MiFID II / MiFIR
What is the difference between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and MiFID II / MiFIR?
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) has 35 controls while MiFID II / MiFIR has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and MiFID II / MiFIR?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and MiFID II / MiFIR so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and MiFID II / MiFIR controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and MiFID II / MiFIR at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) or MiFID II / MiFIR?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs IEC 624431 shared controlVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs Barbados Data Protection Act 20191 shared controlVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)1 shared controlMiFID II / MiFIR vs UAE Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) Regulations1 shared controlMiFID II / MiFIR vs Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements1 shared controlMiFID II / MiFIR vs ISO 270191 shared control
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and MiFID II / MiFIR on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.